|
|
|
|
# Contributor Code of Conduct
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update Code of Conduct 💣
This refinement of the CoC is based on my experiences from other
projects. A series of edits might follow.
As it has a low contributor count, I use this project as a playground to
develop a good CoC which does not focus on identity politics in order to
be a useful tool even with a hate mob pushing in.
My issues with the contributor covenant:
- I don't like its authoritarian tone, I want something more welcoming,
improvement oriented. That'll be addressed next.
- Listing minorities explicitly is en vogue, but does not help to define
acceptable behavior. Looking at prominent projects, this property has
actually been gamed by harassers to say "but check my privilege, i am
$x myself!", which in turn ended up with a non-privilege competition,
generating more toxic waste.
Why don't we just say *there is no acceptable reason for harassment*?
- The list of examples again tries to be a deny-list, where it is
actually just a list of... examples. Let's simplify that list, as it
mostly contains duplicates anyway.
Every explicitly mentioned action provides additional attack surface
for straw-man discussions.
6 years ago
|
|
|
As contributors and maintainers of this project, we pledge to respect all people who
|
|
|
|
|
contribute through any means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are committed to making participation in this project a harassment-free experience for
|
Update Code of Conduct 💣
This refinement of the CoC is based on my experiences from other
projects. A series of edits might follow.
As it has a low contributor count, I use this project as a playground to
develop a good CoC which does not focus on identity politics in order to
be a useful tool even with a hate mob pushing in.
My issues with the contributor covenant:
- I don't like its authoritarian tone, I want something more welcoming,
improvement oriented. That'll be addressed next.
- Listing minorities explicitly is en vogue, but does not help to define
acceptable behavior. Looking at prominent projects, this property has
actually been gamed by harassers to say "but check my privilege, i am
$x myself!", which in turn ended up with a non-privilege competition,
generating more toxic waste.
Why don't we just say *there is no acceptable reason for harassment*?
- The list of examples again tries to be a deny-list, where it is
actually just a list of... examples. Let's simplify that list, as it
mostly contains duplicates anyway.
Every explicitly mentioned action provides additional attack surface
for straw-man discussions.
6 years ago
|
|
|
everyone, regardless of their level of experience and personal or cultural traits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update Code of Conduct 💣
This refinement of the CoC is based on my experiences from other
projects. A series of edits might follow.
As it has a low contributor count, I use this project as a playground to
develop a good CoC which does not focus on identity politics in order to
be a useful tool even with a hate mob pushing in.
My issues with the contributor covenant:
- I don't like its authoritarian tone, I want something more welcoming,
improvement oriented. That'll be addressed next.
- Listing minorities explicitly is en vogue, but does not help to define
acceptable behavior. Looking at prominent projects, this property has
actually been gamed by harassers to say "but check my privilege, i am
$x myself!", which in turn ended up with a non-privilege competition,
generating more toxic waste.
Why don't we just say *there is no acceptable reason for harassment*?
- The list of examples again tries to be a deny-list, where it is
actually just a list of... examples. Let's simplify that list, as it
mostly contains duplicates anyway.
Every explicitly mentioned action provides additional attack surface
for straw-man discussions.
6 years ago
|
|
|
Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include derogatory comments,
|
|
|
|
|
personal attacks, and trolling, both in public or private.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update Code of Conduct 💣
This refinement of the CoC is based on my experiences from other
projects. A series of edits might follow.
As it has a low contributor count, I use this project as a playground to
develop a good CoC which does not focus on identity politics in order to
be a useful tool even with a hate mob pushing in.
My issues with the contributor covenant:
- I don't like its authoritarian tone, I want something more welcoming,
improvement oriented. That'll be addressed next.
- Listing minorities explicitly is en vogue, but does not help to define
acceptable behavior. Looking at prominent projects, this property has
actually been gamed by harassers to say "but check my privilege, i am
$x myself!", which in turn ended up with a non-privilege competition,
generating more toxic waste.
Why don't we just say *there is no acceptable reason for harassment*?
- The list of examples again tries to be a deny-list, where it is
actually just a list of... examples. Let's simplify that list, as it
mostly contains duplicates anyway.
Every explicitly mentioned action provides additional attack surface
for straw-man discussions.
6 years ago
|
|
|
Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject any
|
|
|
|
|
contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct. Project maintainers who
|
|
|
|
|
do not follow the Code of Conduct may be removed from the project team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update Code of Conduct 💣
This refinement of the CoC is based on my experiences from other
projects. A series of edits might follow.
As it has a low contributor count, I use this project as a playground to
develop a good CoC which does not focus on identity politics in order to
be a useful tool even with a hate mob pushing in.
My issues with the contributor covenant:
- I don't like its authoritarian tone, I want something more welcoming,
improvement oriented. That'll be addressed next.
- Listing minorities explicitly is en vogue, but does not help to define
acceptable behavior. Looking at prominent projects, this property has
actually been gamed by harassers to say "but check my privilege, i am
$x myself!", which in turn ended up with a non-privilege competition,
generating more toxic waste.
Why don't we just say *there is no acceptable reason for harassment*?
- The list of examples again tries to be a deny-list, where it is
actually just a list of... examples. Let's simplify that list, as it
mostly contains duplicates anyway.
Every explicitly mentioned action provides additional attack surface
for straw-man discussions.
6 years ago
|
|
|
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by
|
|
|
|
|
opening an issue or contacting one or more of the project maintainers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update Code of Conduct 💣
This refinement of the CoC is based on my experiences from other
projects. A series of edits might follow.
As it has a low contributor count, I use this project as a playground to
develop a good CoC which does not focus on identity politics in order to
be a useful tool even with a hate mob pushing in.
My issues with the contributor covenant:
- I don't like its authoritarian tone, I want something more welcoming,
improvement oriented. That'll be addressed next.
- Listing minorities explicitly is en vogue, but does not help to define
acceptable behavior. Looking at prominent projects, this property has
actually been gamed by harassers to say "but check my privilege, i am
$x myself!", which in turn ended up with a non-privilege competition,
generating more toxic waste.
Why don't we just say *there is no acceptable reason for harassment*?
- The list of examples again tries to be a deny-list, where it is
actually just a list of... examples. Let's simplify that list, as it
mostly contains duplicates anyway.
Every explicitly mentioned action provides additional attack surface
for straw-man discussions.
6 years ago
|
|
|
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant version 1.0.0](http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/0/0/).
|
|
|
|
|
|
