1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc synced 2025-09-20 12:02:46 +02:00
aerc/lib/jwz/testdata/0086.b96641b3e0a2cf8c238976336d45a86c.eml
Robin Jarry 13e9ee3b40 lib: vendor-in the jwz library
The maintainer of this library has gone AWOL. We are depending on
a patch that has never been merged. Let's vendor the library to avoid
future issues.

This patch has been made with the following steps:

git clone https://github.com/konimarti/jwz lib/jwz
git -C lib/jwz checkout fix-missing-messages
mv lib/jwz/test/testdata/ham lib/jwz/testdata
sed -i 's#test/testdata#testdata#' lib/jwz/jwz_test.go
rm -rf lib/jwz/.* lib/jwz/docs lib/jwz/examples lib/jwz/test
sed -i 's#github.com/gatherstars-com/jwz#git.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc/lib/jwz#' \
	lib/threadbuilder.go
go mod tidy
git add --intent-to-add lib/jwz
make fmt

Along with some manual adjustments to fix the linter warnings. Also, to
make the patch smaller, I only kept 93 test emails from the test data
fixture.

Changelog-changed: The JWZ library used for threading is now vendored.
Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry <robin@jarry.cc>
Reviewed-by: Moritz Poldrack <moritz@poldrack.dev>
2025-08-28 09:28:16 +02:00

85 lines
3.8 KiB
Text

From: razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Mon Sep 2 12:22:47 2002
Return-Path: <razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: zzzz@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8855D43F9B
for <zzzz@localhost>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 07:22:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:22:47 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
[216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
g7TNiXZ01537 for <zzzz-razor@example.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:44:33 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kYqW-0003Xb-00; Thu,
29 Aug 2002 16:37:04 -0700
Received: from h-66-166-21-186.snvacaid.covad.net ([66.166.21.186]
helo=rover.vipul.net) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim
3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kYqQ-0006NA-00 for
<razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:36:58 -0700
Received: (from vipul@localhost) by rover.vipul.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
g7TNar604179 for razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 29 Aug 2002
16:36:53 -0700
From: Vipul Ved Prakash <mail@vipul.net>
To: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Collision of hashes?
Message-Id: <20020829163653.A4149@rover.vipul.net>
Reply-To: mail@vipul.net
Mail-Followup-To: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208201746330.23681-100000@r2-pc.dcs.qmul.ac.uk>
<010501c24f82$947b3340$7c640f0a@mfc.corp.mckee.com>
<02082919334401.04648@neofelis>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <02082919334401.04648@neofelis>; from cmeclax@gmx.co.uk on
Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:33:44PM -0400
X-Operating-System: Linux rover.vipul.net 2.4.18
X-Privacy: If possible, encrypt your reply. Key at http://vipul.net/
Sender: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:razor-users-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users>,
<mailto:razor-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <razor-users.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users>,
<mailto:razor-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=razor-users>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:36:53 -0700
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:36:53 -0700
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:33:44PM -0400, cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri wrote:
>
> Was it sent in HTML? If so, and it had a background, the background may have
> been sent in a spam.
razor-agents 2.14 needs all parts to be spam to make a positive decision
(though this will change with the next release), so it couldn't have been
a background. Could you send me the debug log?
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist | widely distributed."
http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users