mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc
synced 2025-09-18 00:32:50 +02:00
13e9ee3b40
The maintainer of this library has gone AWOL. We are depending on a patch that has never been merged. Let's vendor the library to avoid future issues. This patch has been made with the following steps: git clone https://github.com/konimarti/jwz lib/jwz git -C lib/jwz checkout fix-missing-messages mv lib/jwz/test/testdata/ham lib/jwz/testdata sed -i 's#test/testdata#testdata#' lib/jwz/jwz_test.go rm -rf lib/jwz/.* lib/jwz/docs lib/jwz/examples lib/jwz/test sed -i 's#github.com/gatherstars-com/jwz#git.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc/lib/jwz#' \ lib/threadbuilder.go go mod tidy git add --intent-to-add lib/jwz make fmt Along with some manual adjustments to fix the linter warnings. Also, to make the patch smaller, I only kept 93 test emails from the test data fixture. Changelog-changed: The JWZ library used for threading is now vendored. Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry <robin@jarry.cc> Reviewed-by: Moritz Poldrack <moritz@poldrack.dev>
92 lines
3.7 KiB
Text
92 lines
3.7 KiB
Text
From: iiu-admin@taint.org Fri Aug 23 11:06:32 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <iiu-admin@taint.org>
|
|
Delivered-To: zzzz@localhost.netnoteinc.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1494416F
|
|
for <zzzz@localhost>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:04:29 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:04:29 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from dogma.slashnull.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
|
|
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MNM9Z29719;
|
|
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:22:09 +0100
|
|
Received: from mail00.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net
|
|
(mail00.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.16]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7MNJfZ29657 for <iiu@taint.org>;
|
|
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:19:41 +0100
|
|
Received: (qmail 44295 messnum 519748 invoked from
|
|
network[159.134.100.45/k100-45.bas1.dbn.dublin.eircom.net]);
|
|
22 Aug 2002 23:19:43 -0000
|
|
Received: from k100-45.bas1.dbn.dublin.eircom.net (HELO ted.nua.ie)
|
|
(159.134.100.45) by mail00.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 44295) with SMTP;
|
|
22 Aug 2002 23:19:43 -0000
|
|
Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.0.20020823001344.0302c548@dogma.slashnull.org>
|
|
X-Sender: antoinmail@dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1
|
|
To: iiu@taint.org, iiu@taint.org
|
|
From: Antoin O Lachtnain <antoin@eire.com>
|
|
Subject: Re: [IIU] Eircom aDSL Nat'ing
|
|
In-Reply-To: <1030032645.73395.1.camel@flapjack.netability.ie>
|
|
References: <3D650A2D.1000301@dcu.ie> <3D650A2D.1000301@dcu.ie>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
|
|
Sender: iiu-admin@taint.org
|
|
Errors-To: iiu-admin@taint.org
|
|
X-Beenthere: iiu@iiu.taint.org
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.10
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
Reply-To: iiu@taint.org
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://iiu.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/iiu>,
|
|
<mailto:iiu-request@iiu.taint.org?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Irish Internet Users <iiu.iiu.taint.org>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:iiu@iiu.taint.org>
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:iiu-request@iiu.taint.org?subject=help>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://iiu.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/iiu>,
|
|
<mailto:iiu-request@iiu.taint.org?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://iiu.taint.org/pipermail/iiu/>
|
|
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:17:46 +0100
|
|
|
|
At 17:10 22/08/2002 +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
|
|
> > apologies for the possible silly question (i don't think it is, but),
|
|
> > but is Eircom's aDSL service NAT'ed?
|
|
>
|
|
>No - you get unfiltered access with a real (but dynamic) IP address.
|
|
>
|
|
> > and what implications would that have for VoIP? I know there are
|
|
> > difficulties with VoIP or connecting to clients connected to a NAT'ed
|
|
> > network from the internet wild (i.e. machines with static, real IPs)
|
|
>
|
|
>You will probably suffer from the high latency of DLS lines. Typically,
|
|
>you're talking about 50ms RTT to the local bas, which is pretty high.
|
|
>If your voip application can handle this, then you're ok.
|
|
>
|
|
>Nick
|
|
|
|
what's the deal with all this latency? it's not like that in other places
|
|
where I've used dsl. i read some story about it being done that way to
|
|
allow greater distances to be covered or something like that. however, my
|
|
knowledge of physics is really only newtonian, and I don't understand how
|
|
worsening latency could possibly improve the reliability of a 2000 foot
|
|
long piece of copper. Perhaps it has something to do with stretching the
|
|
time-space continuum? can someone explain this in words of five syllables
|
|
or less?
|
|
|
|
a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>_______________________________________________
|
|
>IIU mailing list
|
|
>IIU@iiu.taint.org
|
|
>http://iiu.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/iiu
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
Antoin O Lachtnain
|
|
** antoin@eire.com ** http://www.eire.com ** +353-87-240-6691
|
|
|
|
_______________________________________________
|
|
IIU mailing list
|
|
IIU@iiu.taint.org
|
|
http://iiu.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/iiu
|
|
|